Search for: "Coca-Cola Consolidated" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 5:39 am by Steve Baird
Yet, it remains to be seen whether Coca-Cola will prevail in the consolidated opposition brought by Royal Crown Company, perhaps its most significant challenge to date regarding the ZERO series of marks. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by Steve Baird
In case you’re wondering about the status of the consolidated ZERO trademark oppositions brought by RC Cola (on genericness grounds) that Coca-Cola is currently defending at the TTAB, the parties are waiting for the Board to schedule a date for oral argument — this one might be worth attending, as I’ve written previously: [I]t remains to be seen whether Coca-Cola will prevail in the consolidated opposition brought by… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Tom Smith
This led to repeated customer complaints, and eventually led Cooper's employer (Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., or CCCI) to reassign Cooper to a lower-paying non-customer-facing warehouse position, $18.96/hour instead of $20.38/hour. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:31 am
The Coca-Cola Company, Oppositions Nos. 91178927 et al. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The sector is fairly consolidated, and the aforementioned companies, accompanied by PepsiCo, The Coca-Cola Company, Mars, Mondelez, Danone, Kraft-Heinz, Associated British Foods, General Mills, and Colgate-Palmolive, collectively own over 550 different consumer brands. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:45 am by Sean Wajert
Common defendants The Coca-Cola Company and Energy Brands Inc. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:12 am
The Coca-Cola Company, Oppositions Nos. 91178927, et al. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Rather than pocket the $10, you can reinvest it to buy more Coca-Cola stock. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 9:39 am by John Jascob
A search of the Wolters Kluwer Cheetah platform’s SEC Staff Comment Letters database and of the SEC EDGAR database revealed SEC staff comment letter dialogs with five companies: Masco Corporation; Boeing Company; Coca Cola Company; Graphic Packaging Holding Company; and Procter & Gamble Co. [read post]
Coca-Cola sought to pause discovery while the Ninth Circuit decided three false labeling cases because those cases would resolve several open questions as to class certification in labeling cases that would be on point for class certification proceedings in Coca-Cola’s case. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:28 am
PG&E (05-1429); 06-82 pending the Safeco and Geico insurance cases (06-84 and 06-100); 06-306, likely pending BCI Coca-Cola v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:31 am by Brennan W. Bolt
By late afternoon, Teamsters Local 175 and Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated (CCBCC) had settled a strike that had started earlier that morning. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The case of BCI Coca-Cola Co. of Los Angeles v. [read post]